lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:02:03 +0200
From:   Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        jthierry@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] objtool changes to remove all
 ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE


On 4/7/20 3:35 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is version v2 of this patchset based on the different comments
>> received so far. It now uses and includes PeterZ patch to add
>> UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET. Other changes are described below.
>>
>> Code like retpoline or RSB stuffing, which is used to mitigate some of
>> the speculative execution issues, is currently ignored by objtool with
>> the ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE directive. This series adds support
>> for intra-function calls to objtool so that it can handle such a code.
>> With these changes, we can remove all ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE
>> directives.
>>
>> Changes:
>>   - replace RETPOLINE_RET with PeterZ UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET
>>   - make objtool intra-function call action architecture dependent
>>   - objtool now automatically detects and validates all intra-function
>>     calls but it issues a warning if the call was not explicitly tagged
>>   - change __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER to work with objtool
>>   - add generic ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL macro
>>   - remove all ANNOTATE_SPEC_ALTERNATIVE (even for __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER)
> 
> I had trouble applying the patches.  What branch are they based on?  In
> general the latest tip/master is good.

Oups, this is on based on 5.5. I didn't realize I was that late, I though
I recently rebased but it looks like I didn't. Sorry about that, I will
make sure the next version is more recent.

alex.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ