lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200407135853.GQ18914@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:58:53 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] powerpc/pseries/hotplug-memory: stop checking
 is_mem_section_removable()

On Tue 07-04-20 15:54:15, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> In commit 53cdc1cb29e8 ("drivers/base/memory.c: indicate all memory
> blocks as removable"), the user space interface to compute whether a memory
> block can be offlined (exposed via
> /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/removable) has effectively been
> deprecated. We want to remove the leftovers of the kernel implementation.
> 
> When offlining a memory block (mm/memory_hotplug.c:__offline_pages()),
> we'll start by:
> 1. Testing if it contains any holes, and reject if so
> 2. Testing if pages belong to different zones, and reject if so
> 3. Isolating the page range, checking if it contains any unmovable pages
> 
> Using is_mem_section_removable() before trying to offline is not only racy,
> it can easily result in false positives/negatives. Let's stop manually
> checking is_mem_section_removable(), and let device_offline() handle it
> completely instead. We can remove the racy is_mem_section_removable()
> implementation next.
> 
> We now take more locks (e.g., memory hotplug lock when offlining and the
> zone lock when isolating), but maybe we should optimize that
> implementation instead if this ever becomes a real problem (after all,
> memory unplug is already an expensive operation). We started using
> is_mem_section_removable() in commit 51925fb3c5c9 ("powerpc/pseries:
> Implement memory hotplug remove in the kernel"), with the initial
> hotremove support of lmbs.

I am not familiar with this code but it makes sense to make it sync with
the global behavior.

> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
>  .../platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c        | 26 +++----------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index b2cde1732301..5ace2f9a277e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -337,39 +337,19 @@ static int pseries_remove_mem_node(struct device_node *np)
>  
>  static bool lmb_is_removable(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
>  {
> -	int i, scns_per_block;
> -	bool rc = true;
> -	unsigned long pfn, block_sz;
> -	u64 phys_addr;
> -
>  	if (!(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	block_sz = memory_block_size_bytes();
> -	scns_per_block = block_sz / MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
> -	phys_addr = lmb->base_addr;
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FA_DUMP
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't hot-remove memory that falls in fadump boot memory area
>  	 * and memory that is reserved for capturing old kernel memory.
>  	 */
> -	if (is_fadump_memory_area(phys_addr, block_sz))
> +	if (is_fadump_memory_area(lmb->base_addr, memory_block_size_bytes()))
>  		return false;
>  #endif
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < scns_per_block; i++) {
> -		pfn = PFN_DOWN(phys_addr);
> -		if (!pfn_in_present_section(pfn)) {
> -			phys_addr += MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		rc = rc && is_mem_section_removable(pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> -		phys_addr += MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return rc;
> +	/* device_offline() will determine if we can actually remove this lmb */
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *);
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ