[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11aecb68-d243-2eeb-0cc8-50e1ec22bd71@web.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:52:31 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Input: ep93xx_keypad: Checking for a failed platform_get_irq() call
in ep93xx_keypad_probe()
Hello,
I have taken another look at the implementation of the function “ep93xx_keypad_probe”.
A software analysis approach points the following source code out for
further development considerations.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.3/source/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c#L252
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c?id=f5e94d10e4c468357019e5c28d48499f677b284f#n252
keypad->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (!keypad->irq) {
err = -ENXIO;
goto failed_free;
}
The software documentation is providing the following information
for the used programming interface.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/base/platform.c?id=f5e94d10e4c468357019e5c28d48499f677b284f#n221
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.3/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L202
“…
* Return: IRQ number on success, negative error number on failure.
…”
Would you like to reconsider the shown condition check?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists