[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200409204819.GR75430@dtor-ws>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:48:19 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: Input: ep93xx_keypad: Checking for a failed platform_get_irq()
call in ep93xx_keypad_probe()
Hi Markus,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 06:52:31PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have taken another look at the implementation of the function “ep93xx_keypad_probe”.
> A software analysis approach points the following source code out for
> further development considerations.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.3/source/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c#L252
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c?id=f5e94d10e4c468357019e5c28d48499f677b284f#n252
>
> keypad->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (!keypad->irq) {
> err = -ENXIO;
> goto failed_free;
> }
>
>
> The software documentation is providing the following information
> for the used programming interface.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/base/platform.c?id=f5e94d10e4c468357019e5c28d48499f677b284f#n221
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.3/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L202
>
> “…
> * Return: IRQ number on success, negative error number on failure.
> …”
>
> Would you like to reconsider the shown condition check?
Platform code historically allowed creating IRQ resources with IRQ
number 0 to indicate "no interrupt assigned", so this driver tries to
filter out such conditions. The negative IRQs (errors) will be rejected
by request_irq() but I guess we can lose -EPROBE_DEFER. We could do
if (keypad->irq <= 0) {
err = keypad->irq ?: -ENXIO : keypad->irq;
goto failed_free;
}
or, maybe we should take a look at platform_get_irq() and see if we can
stop it returning 0 interrupt numbers and clean up the drivers.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists