[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EFD902AA-B999-4E13-AC1E-1A28E93435BB@ubuntu.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 08:53:47 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
CC: ebiederm@...ssion.com, oleg@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, guro@...com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, jannh@...gle.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
Yanxiaodan <yanxiaodan@...wei.com>,
linfeilong <linfeilong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: check sig before setting info in kill_pid_usb_asyncio
On April 9, 2020 5:26:08 AM GMT+02:00, Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com> wrote:
>Friendly ping...
>
>On 2020/3/30 16:44, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:18:33AM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
>>>
>>> In kill_pid_usb_asyncio, if signal is not valid, we do not need to
>>> set info struct.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
>>
>> I'd have done:
>>
>> if (!valid_signal(sig))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> instead of setting ret to EINVAL above but that's mostly a matter of
>style.
>>
>> Picking this up unless someone sees a problem with it.
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
>>
>> .
>>
The patches are queued for after rc1. So around next week.
They came too late to make it into the merge window.
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists