[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d00096f-94f7-753e-c05f-14860fed2abe@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 11:26:08 +0800
From:   Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
CC:     <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <oleg@...hat.com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
        <guro@...com>, <joel@...lfernandes.org>, <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
        Yanxiaodan <yanxiaodan@...wei.com>,
        linfeilong <linfeilong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: check sig before setting info in
 kill_pid_usb_asyncio
Friendly ping...
On 2020/3/30 16:44, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:18:33AM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
>>
>> In kill_pid_usb_asyncio, if signal is not valid, we do not need to
>> set info struct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
> 
> I'd have done:
> 
> if (!valid_signal(sig))
> 	return -EINVAL;
> 
> instead of setting ret to EINVAL above but that's mostly a matter of style.
> 
> Picking this up unless someone sees a problem with it.
> 
> Thank you!
> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
> 
> .
> 
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
