[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200409125526.GC13078@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:55:26 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in
ID_PFR0 register
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
> specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
> #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT 4
> #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT 0
>
> +#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT 24
> +#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT 16
> +
> #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT 4
> #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT 0
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
> };
>
> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
Same comment as CSV3 here. Why is CSV2 being treated as strict here, but not
in the aa64* register?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists