linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200409135458.GE13078@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:54:58 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:20:20PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/06/2020 10:39 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:03PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
> >> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
> >> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
> >> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
> >>
> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
> >>
> >> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
> >> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.
> > 
> > The latest Arm ARM also talks about DFR1 and MMFR5. Please can you include
> 
> Sure, will do.
> 
> > those too? Might also be worth checking to see if anything is missing on
> > the 64-bit side as well (I didn't look).
> 
> Yeah. Now there some missing ones, will add those as well.

Thanks. Just as a heads up that I've also got a handful of changes in
this area, but we can resolve the conflicts at -rc1.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=sanity-checks

Will