[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200410074440.GA35316@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 00:44:40 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Jian Cai <caij2003@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
manojgupta@...gle.com, Peter.Smith@....com, stefan@...er.ch,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, ilie.halip@...il.com, jiancai@...gle.com,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <armlinux@...isordat.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: do not assemble iwmmxt.S with LLVM toolchain
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 08:38:05AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:28 AM Jian Cai <caij2003@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > iwmmxt.S contains XScale instructions LLVM ARM backend does not support.
> > Skip this file if LLVM integrated assemmbler or LLD is used to build ARM
> > kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jian Cai <caij2003@...il.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > init/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > index 66a04f6f4775..39de8fc64a73 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ source "arch/arm/mm/Kconfig"
> >
> > config IWMMXT
> > bool "Enable iWMMXt support"
> > - depends on CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_MOHAWK || CPU_PJ4 || CPU_PJ4B
> > + depends on !AS_IS_CLANG && !LD_IS_LLD && (CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_MOHAWK || CPU_PJ4 || CPU_PJ4B)
> > default y if PXA27x || PXA3xx || ARCH_MMP || CPU_PJ4 || CPU_PJ4B
> > help
> > Enable support for iWMMXt context switching at run time if
> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > index 1c12059e0f7e..b0ab3271e900 100644
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ config GCC_VERSION
> > config CC_IS_CLANG
> > def_bool $(success,$(CC) --version | head -n 1 | grep -q clang)
> >
> > +config AS_IS_CLANG
> > + def_bool $(success,$(AS) --version | head -n 1 | grep -q clang)
> > +
> > +config LD_IS_LLD
> > + def_bool $(success,$(LD) --version | head -n 1 | grep -q LLD)
> > +
> > config CLANG_VERSION
> > int
> > default $(shell,$(srctree)/scripts/clang-version.sh $(CC))
> > --
> > 2.26.0.110.g2183baf09c-goog
>
> Yesterday, when looking trough commits in Linus tree, I saw:
>
> "init/kconfig: Add LD_VERSION Kconfig"
>
> Nick had a patchset to distinguish LINKER via Kconfig (I cannot find
> it right now).
Probably referring to this?
https://github.com/samitolvanen/linux/commit/61889e01f0ed4f07a9d631f163bba6c6637bfa46
> So we should do all this the way CC_IS_XXX CC_VERSION handling is done.
>
> I just want to point to [2] where we can rework (simplify) this
> handling for CC and LD handling in a further step.
> In one of Peter Z. tree someone started to do so (I was inspired by that).
>
> Unfortunately, the hunk from [1] is IMHO a bit mis-placed and CC and
> LD handling should stay together:
>
> CC_IS_XXX where XXX is GCC or CLANG
> CC_VERSION where CC is GCC or CLANG
Are you suggesting unifying GCC_VERSION and CLANG_VERSION or am I
misunderstanding what you wrote here? Do you mean XXX_VERSION where XXX
is GCC or CLANG?
> LD_IS_XXX where XXX is BFD or GOLD or LLD
> LD_VERSION
ld.gold is no longer allowed to link the kernel so there is no point in
accounting for it in Kconfig. That leaves only ld.bfd and ld.lld to
account for. I do not think there is a point in adding LD_IS_BFD;
!LD_IS_LLD covers that since there is not another linker (at least that
I am aware of) that links the kernel.
Compiler is different because it technically has three options if icc
even still works to build the kernel.
LD_VERISON is explicitly an ld.bfd thing due to the way ld-version.sh
is written:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/ld-version.sh
There is not much of a reason to try and make LLD work with that given
we do not need it now. I am of the mindset that proactively changing
something only makes life more difficult down the road and makes things
harder to maintain.
We could suggest renaming that config to GNU_LD_VERSION and gnu-ld-version.sh
to be slightly more accurate but I am not sure that is necessary since
again, CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD will handle any incompatibilities that we
encounter with LD_VERSION, just like we do with CLANG_VERSION/GCC_VERSION.
See my commit for the __gnu_mcount_nc thing in ARM for an example of
that (CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC still needs to be specified).
https://git.kernel.org/linus/b0fe66cf095016e0b238374c10ae366e1f087d11
> Just my €0,02.
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/9553d16fa671b9621c5e2847d08bd90d3be3349c
> [2] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/941
>
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists