[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3uj7AHbAo4sNzr6KQx5Fk6v99k4ZixCgKo1tUuGoat9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:56:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jian Cai <caij2003@...il.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Manoj Gupta <manojgupta@...gle.com>, Peter.Smith@....com,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@...il.com>, jiancai@...gle.com,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <armlinux@...isordat.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: do not assemble iwmmxt.S with LLVM toolchain
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:28 AM Jian Cai <caij2003@...il.com> wrote:
>
> iwmmxt.S contains XScale instructions LLVM ARM backend does not support.
> Skip this file if LLVM integrated assemmbler or LLD is used to build ARM
> kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jian Cai <caij2003@...il.com>
It clearly makes sense to limit the Kconfig option to compilers that
can actually build it.
A few questions though:
- Given that Armada XP with its PJ4B was still marketed until fairly
recently[1],
wouldn't it make sense to still add support for it? Is it a lot of work?
- Why does the linker have to understand it, rather than just the assembler?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 66a04f6f4775..39de8fc64a73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ source "arch/arm/mm/Kconfig"
>
> config IWMMXT
> bool "Enable iWMMXt support"
> - depends on CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_MOHAWK || CPU_PJ4 || CPU_PJ4B
> + depends on !AS_IS_CLANG && !LD_IS_LLD && (CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_MOHAWK || CPU_PJ4 || CPU_PJ4B)
I would suggest splitting it into two lines for readability:
depends on CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_MOHAWK || CPU_PJ4 || CPU_PJ4B
depends on !AS_IS_CLANG && !LD_IS_LLD
Arnd
[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20191015165247/https://www.marvell.com/embedded-processors/armada/index.jsp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists