[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d42889be3ae1c77c6ca33d9dbd87ab46c749cfff.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:46:49 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: jz4770: Add a missing '\n' in a log message
On Sat, 2020-04-11 at 15:13 +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Le sam. 11 avril 2020 à 8:38, Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> a écrit :
> > Message logged by 'dev_xxx()' or 'pr_xxx()' should end with a '\n'.
>
> Is that so?
> From what I could see these macros add the \n themselves if needed.
Not so.
> So the \n were omitted on purpose.
Just a trivial oversight really.
AFAIK: It's an issue _only_ in two cases:
p another process emits a printk with KERN_CONT (or pr_cont)
that might extend this message in the log on the same line.
o this message wukk not be emitted into the log until another
message arrives
Powered by blists - more mailing lists