linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] scsi: ufs-exynos: add UFS host support for Exynos SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200413133926.GA29228@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 06:39:26 -0700
From:   'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc:     'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>, robh@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, krzk@...nel.org,
        kwmad.kim@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, cang@...eaurora.org,
        'Seungwon Jeon' <essuuj@...il.com>, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] scsi: ufs-exynos: add UFS host support for Exynos
 SoCs

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 09:54:53PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> > So this doesn't actually require the various removed or not added quirks
> after
> > all?
> This driver is actual consumer of those quirks, so those are still needed.
> On Martin's 5.7/scsi-queue need to revert " 492001990f64 scsi: ufshcd:
> remove unused quirks"

No. You need to include one patch per quirk in your series to add them
back.  Please also follow all proper kernel style guidelines, as the
old code didn't always follow the proper style.