linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: vt6656: Use define instead of magic number for tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:38:36 +0200
From:   Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: vt6656: Use define instead of magic
 number for tx_rate

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:29:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:56:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 06:39:14PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote:
> > > > Use the define RATE_11M present in the file "device.h" instead of the
> > > > magic number 3. So the code is more clear.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c | 3 ++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > This patch did not apply to my tree, please rebase and resend.
> > >
> > I need to rebase only this patch for this serie so, it's necessary to send all
> > the serie or only this patch?
>
> If I applied the other one, just this patch.
>
> > If it's only this patch I need to indicate v4 in the subject or a v2 due it's
> > related only with this patch?
>
> As so many of your patches were rejected because of this, rebase them
> all, and resend them all as a single patch series, so that I know what
> order to apply them in and have a chance to get it right :)

Ok, I will create a patch series with all the rejected patches rebased.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

thanks,

oscar carter