linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/22] memory: tegra: Register as interconnect provider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d8dd1aa-71b3-e090-5637-578e23150bf1@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:01:07 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/22] memory: tegra: Register as interconnect provider

Hello Georgi,

13.04.2020 15:43, Georgi Djakov пишет:
...
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT)) {
> 
> The interconnect framework can be also a module and the then the build will fail.

That's a good catch!

>> +		err = tegra_mc_interconnect_setup(mc);
> 
> Maybe register the interconnect provider as a platform sub-device instead?

The sub-device sound like a bit too much of hassle. I'm curious whether
we could try to make all the tegra-memory drivers modular, please let me
try..