[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fb0643342e512a248f57198cbafe50c@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:20:47 +0530
From: kgunda@...eaurora.org
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
jingoohan1@...il.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com,
pavel@....cz, mark.rutland@....com, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] backlight: qcom-wled: convert the wled bindings to
.yaml format
On 2020-04-06 14:20, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 04:45:49PM +0530, kgunda@...eaurora.org wrote:
>> > On 2020-03-31 23:24, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
>> > > > diff --git
>> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
>> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
>> > > > new file mode 100644
>> > > > index 0000000..8a388bf
>> > > > --- /dev/null
>> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
>> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
>> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> > > > +%YAML 1.2
>> > > > +---
>> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml#
>> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> > > > +
>> > > > +title: Binding for Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. WLED driver
>> > > > +
>> > > > +maintainers:
>> > > > + - Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> > >
>> > > Should be the h/w owner (you), not who applies patches.
>> > >
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>> > <snip>
>> > will address in next post.
>>
>> If you agree on all points raised I doubt there is any need for a
>> point
>> by point reply since everyone who reads it will have to scroll down
>> simply to find out that you agree on all points.
>>
>> Better just to acknowledge the feedback and reply to the first one
>> saying you'll agree on all points and will address all feedback in the
>> next revision (and then trim the reply to keep it short).
>
> Or better still, just submit the next revision with all the fixes. :)
Noted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists