[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200406085024.GF30614@dell>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:50:24 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: kgunda@...eaurora.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, jingoohan1@...il.com,
b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, pavel@....cz, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] backlight: qcom-wled: convert the wled bindings
to .yaml format
On Fri, 03 Apr 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 04:45:49PM +0530, kgunda@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > On 2020-03-31 23:24, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..8a388bf
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Binding for Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. WLED driver
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > + - Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Should be the h/w owner (you), not who applies patches.
> > >
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
> > <snip>
> > will address in next post.
>
> If you agree on all points raised I doubt there is any need for a point
> by point reply since everyone who reads it will have to scroll down
> simply to find out that you agree on all points.
>
> Better just to acknowledge the feedback and reply to the first one
> saying you'll agree on all points and will address all feedback in the
> next revision (and then trim the reply to keep it short).
Or better still, just submit the next revision with all the fixes. :)
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists