linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202004131350.ewIW96s2%lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:42:28 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, arnd@...db.de, baolin.wang7@...il.com,
        orsonzhai@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request_atomic()
 API

Hi Baolin,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
[cannot apply to arm-soc/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/Introduce-the-request_atomic-for-the-host/20200413-105346
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 8f3d9f354286745c751374f5f1fcafee6b3f3136
config: x86_64-randconfig-s2-20200413 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-5 (Ubuntu 5.5.0-12ubuntu1) 5.5.0 20171010
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5:0,
                    from include/linux/bitfield.h:10,
                    from drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:12:
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c: In function 'sdhci_request_atomic':
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2076:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_present_error' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
         ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var'
    #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                       ^
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2076:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
     if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
     ^
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2081:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_manual_cmd23' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
           ^
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2090:2: error: invalid use of void expression
     if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
     ^
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2090:2: error: invalid use of void expression
   In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5:0,
                    from include/linux/bitfield.h:10,
                    from drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:12:
>> include/linux/compiler.h:61:16: error: invalid use of void expression
     static struct ftrace_branch_data  \
                   ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:69: note: in expansion of macro '__trace_if_value'
    #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                                        ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:28: note: in expansion of macro '__trace_if_var'
    #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                               ^
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2090:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
     if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
     ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/if +2076 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c

  2066	
  2067	int sdhci_request_atomic(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
  2068	{
  2069		struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
  2070		struct mmc_command *cmd;
  2071		unsigned long flags;
  2072		int ret = 0;
  2073	
  2074		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
  2075	
> 2076		if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
  2077			sdhci_finish_mrq(host, mrq);
  2078			goto out_finish;
  2079		}
  2080	
  2081		cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
  2082	
  2083		/*
  2084		 * The HSQ may send a command in interrupt context without polling
  2085		 * the busy signaling, which means we should return BUSY if controller
  2086		 * has not released inhibit bits to allow HSQ trying to send request
  2087		 * again in non-atomic context. So we should not finish this request
  2088		 * here.
  2089		 */
  2090		if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
  2091			ret = -EBUSY;
  2092		else
  2093			sdhci_led_activate(host);
  2094	
  2095	out_finish:
  2096		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
  2097		return ret;
  2098	}
  2099	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_request_atomic);
  2100	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (31571 bytes)