linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: ipc command timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN6PR1101MB21328B6F4147640D07F9E40A97DA0@BN6PR1101MB2132.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:20:26 +0000
From:   "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
CC:     Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com" 
        <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        "amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com" 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: ipc command timeout

> 
> I have mixed feelings about this.
> 
> One one hand, this looks simple enough.
> 
> But on the other hand we have other users of memcpy_fromio(), including
> SOF drivers, so what are the odds we have the same problems in other
> places? Wouldn't it be safer to either change this function so that it's
> behavior is not ambiguous or compiler-dependent, or fix the compiler?
> 

Hi Pierre and Amadeusz,

I have to admit that I didn't dig into clang's __builtin_memcpy to see what's
happening inside so I don't have direct evidence to say it's clang's problem.
What I know is kernel built by clang10 works fine but have this issue once
changed to clang11. At first I also suspect that it's a timing issue so I checked
the command transaction. The transaction is simple, host writes command
in SST_IPCX register, the DSP then writes reply in SST_IPCD register and
trigger an interrupt. Finally the irq thread sst_byt_irq_thread() reads the
SST_IPCD register to complete the transaction. I added some debug messages
to see if there is something wrong in the transaction but it all looks good. 

I am also confused that why this only happens to BYT but not BDW since they
share the same register accessing code in sst-dsp.c. I checked the code and
realized that in BDW, the irq thread (hsw_irq_thread) performs 32-bit register
read instead of 64-bit in BYT platform. Therefore I change the code in BYT to
use two readl() calls and found the problem is gone. My best guess is it's
related to the implementation of __builtin_memcpy() but not sure it's the
timing or implementing cause this problem.

Regards,
Brent