[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200414203912.GA1982089@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:39:12 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/9] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 08:23:06AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:40:40PM -0700, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > STATX_ATTR_DAX
> >
> > The file is in the DAX (cpu direct access) state. DAX state
> > attempts to minimize software cache effects for both I/O and
> > memory mappings of this file. It requires a file system which
> > has been configured to support DAX.
>
> Can we remove the misleading DAX name? Something like
> STATX_ATTR_DIRECT_LOAD_STORE?
This is easy enough to change but...
Honestly I feel like this ship has already sailed. We have so much out there
which uses the term "DAX". Is it really better to introduce a new terminology
for the same thing?
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists