[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da6afb7c-d543-b0a3-c165-89ad0b2a2783@linux.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:29:02 +0300
From: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Ian Molton <spyro@....com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Floppy driver cleanups
Hi,
On 4/14/20 8:31 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:46:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I'll be happy to queue these up for 5.8 when ready. Would be handy
>> if you could resend a v2 patchset with the extra patches, makes my
>> life so much easier...
>
> Sure, will do once Denis confirms he's done with the review and is
> OK with the series.
>
> Thanks!
> Willy
>
I can see no new issues, respecting that the initial version
was sent privately and additional [24-27] fixups.
[+] eye checked the changes
[+] compile tested the patches on x86, arm, powerpc, sparc64,
m68k (forced ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC by removing BROKEN)
sparc64 showed a couple of warnings in printks
I was expecting that some of the arch maintainers will at least
ack the patches.
[+] tested on real hardware for x86
[+] local syzkaller fuzzing reveals no new issues
Willy, could you please resend the patchset with printks fix for sparc64?
Or if Jens don't mind and you don't want to send 30 patches again you can
resend only sparc64 patch and I will reapply it and send everything to Jens
with merge request. I applied your patches a couple of days ago here
https://github.com/evdenis/linux-floppy/ to cleanups branch.
I also faced minor ubsan warning in setup_rw_floppy that is not related
to these patches. It's false alarm of cross-boundary access of cmd,
reply_count, reply in floppy_raw_cmd. This access is intentional.
I will send a patch on top of your patchset.
Thanks,
Denis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists