[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200414141951.19120-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 22:19:51 +0800
From: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: minyard@....org, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>,
Shengju Zhang <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ipmi:bt-bmc: Delete superfluous dev_warm() in bt_bmc_config_irq()
The priority of dev_warm() is higher than dev_info(),so if the
function bt_bmc_probe() uses dev_info() to print error message,
the dev_warm() is redundant.Thus should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Shengju Zhang <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
index cd0349bff..1d4bf5c65 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
@@ -406,7 +406,6 @@ static int bt_bmc_config_irq(struct bt_bmc *bt_bmc,
rc = devm_request_irq(dev, bt_bmc->irq, bt_bmc_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
DEVICE_NAME, bt_bmc);
if (rc < 0) {
- dev_warn(dev, "Unable to request IRQ %d\n", bt_bmc->irq);
bt_bmc->irq = 0;
return rc;
}
--
2.20.1.windows.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists