lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1586875675.f8q1grbltc.astroid@bobo.none>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:48:13 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/vmalloc: Hugepage vmalloc mappings

Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of April 14, 2020 11:02 pm:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:13:44PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Which case? Usually the answer would be because you don't want to use
>> contiguous physical memory and/or you don't want to use the linear 
>> mapping.
> 
> But with huge pages you do by definition already use large contiguous
> areas.  So you want allocations larger than "small" huge pages but not
> using gigantic pages using vmalloc?

Yes.

Thanks,
Nick

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ