linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/mce/therm_throt: remove unused platform_thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64f368b6bfde0611d3a1bc24884242bc4fb4cecd.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:49:15 -0700
From:   Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        bberg@...hat.com, bp@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/mce/therm_throt: remove unused
 platform_thermal_notify function pointer

On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 22:21 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:56 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 00:33 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > A long time ago platform_thermal_notify was added as some generic
> > > mechanism for platform drivers to hook thermal events. It seems
> > > as
> > > though this has been entirely superseded, and nothing uses it.
> > > Remove
> > > the plumbing for this, since this code runs in an interrupt hot
> > > path.
> > Good idea.
> 
> Will you take this into your tree?
I am not the maintainer of this tree. So I don't decide this. I can
just give my opinion.

>  If not, how do your thermal patches
> usually go in? A reviewed-by might be useful in that case.
For this patch:

Reviewed-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>

> 
> Jason