[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJgZaQux04vdkShX4vkmOK5T-H6tOXt7Da19jgG0P76-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:27:46 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@...il.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: power: supply: Add device-tree binding
for Summit SMB3xx
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> 10.04.2020 19:49, Rob Herring пишет:
> ...
> >> + summit,max-chg-curr:
> >> + description: Maximum current for charging (in uA)
> >> + allOf:
> >> + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> +
> >> + summit,max-chg-volt:
> >> + description: Maximum voltage for charging (in uV)
> >> + allOf:
> >> + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> + minimum: 3500000
> >> + maximum: 4500000
> >> +
> >> + summit,pre-chg-curr:
> >> + description: Pre-charging current for charging (in uA)
> >> + allOf:
> >> + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> +
> >> + summit,term-curr:
> >> + description: Charging cycle termination current (in uA)
> >> + allOf:
> >> + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> ...
> > These are all properties of the battery attached and we have standard
> > properties for some/all of these.
>
> Looks like only four properties seem to be matching the properties of
> the battery.txt binding.
>
> Are you suggesting that these matching properties should be renamed
> after the properties in battery.txt?
Yes, and that there should be a battery node. Possibly you should add
new properties battery.txt. It's curious that different properties are
needed. Ultimately, for a given battery technology I would expect
there's a fixed set of properties needed to describe how to charge
them. Perhaps some of these properties can just be derived from other
properties and folks are just picking what a specific charger wants.
Unfortunately, we have just a mess of stuff made up for each charger
out there. I don't have the time nor the experience in this area to do
much more than say do better.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists