[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202004150943.01DF9E85@keescook>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:44:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_firmware: remove unnecessary test_fw_mutex in
test_dev_config_show_xxx
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:28:18AM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On 2020-04-14 8:10 p.m., Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:25:17PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > Remove unnecessary use of test_fw_mutex in test_dev_config_show_xxx
> > > functions that show simple bool, int, and u8.
> > I would expect at least a READ_ONCE(), yes?
> I don't understand why you need a READ_ONCE when removing a mutex around an
> assignment
> of a parameter passed into a function being assigned to a local variable.
>
> Could you please explain your expectations.
Oops, yes, you're right. I misread and was thinking this was reading
from a global. This looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/test_firmware.c | 26 +++-----------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/test_firmware.c b/lib/test_firmware.c
> > > index 0c7fbcf07ac5..9fee2b93a8d1 100644
> > > --- a/lib/test_firmware.c
> > > +++ b/lib/test_firmware.c
> > > @@ -310,27 +310,13 @@ static int test_dev_config_update_bool(const char *buf, size_t size,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > -static ssize_t
> > > -test_dev_config_show_bool(char *buf,
> > > - bool config)
> > > +static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_bool(char *buf, bool val)
> > > {
> > > - bool val;
> > > -
> > > - mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > - val = config;
> > > - mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > -
> > > return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", val);
> > > }
> > > -static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_int(char *buf, int cfg)
> > > +static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_int(char *buf, int val)
> > > {
> > > - int val;
> > > -
> > > - mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > - val = cfg;
> > > - mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > -
> > > return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", val);
> > > }
> > > @@ -354,14 +340,8 @@ static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg)
> > > return size;
> > > }
> > > -static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_u8(char *buf, u8 cfg)
> > > +static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_u8(char *buf, u8 val)
> > > {
> > > - u8 val;
> > > -
> > > - mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > - val = cfg;
> > > - mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > -
> > > return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", val);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists