| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 22:13:19 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pradeep P V K <ppvk@...eaurora.org>,
Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>,
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/21] mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state
On 4/15/2020 7:22 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 15:48, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> On some qualcomm SoCs we need to vote on a performance state of a power
>> domain depending on the clock rates. Hence move to using OPP api to set
>> the clock rate and performance state specified in the OPP table.
>> On platforms without an OPP table, dev_pm_opp_set_rate() is eqvivalent to
>> clk_set_rate()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@...eaurora.org>
>> Cc: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
>> Cc: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
>> Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
>
> This looks good to me!
>
> However, are there any of the other patches in the series that
> $subject patch depends on - or can I apply this as a standalone mmc
> patch?
Hey Ulf, thanks for the review. I'll just need to respin these to make
sure I do not do a dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() if dev_pm_opp_of_add_table()
isn;t successful as discussed with Viresh on another thread [1]
As for the dependencies, its only PATCH 01/21 in this series and that's
already been queued by Viresh [2]
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/18
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/14/98
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> index 09ff731..d82075a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> @@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>> struct clk *xo_clk; /* TCXO clk needed for FLL feature of cm_dll*/
>> struct clk_bulk_data bulk_clks[4]; /* core, iface, cal, sleep clocks */
>> unsigned long clk_rate;
>> + struct opp_table *opp;
>> struct mmc_host *mmc;
>> bool use_14lpp_dll_reset;
>> bool tuning_done;
>> @@ -332,7 +334,7 @@ static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> int rc;
>>
>> clock = msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(host, clock);
>> - rc = clk_set_rate(core_clk, clock);
>> + rc = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(mmc_dev(host->mmc), clock);
>> if (rc) {
>> pr_err("%s: Failed to set clock at rate %u at timing %d\n",
>> mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clock,
>> @@ -1963,7 +1965,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> msm_host->bulk_clks[0].clk = clk;
>>
>> /* Vote for maximum clock rate for maximum performance */
>> - ret = clk_set_rate(clk, INT_MAX);
>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&pdev->dev, INT_MAX);
>> if (ret)
>> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "core clock boost failed\n");
>>
>> @@ -2087,6 +2089,9 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto clk_disable;
>> }
>>
>> + msm_host->opp = dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(&pdev->dev, "core");
>> + dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>> @@ -2109,10 +2114,12 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>>
>> pm_runtime_disable:
>> + dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>> clk_disable:
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&pdev->dev, 0);
>> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
>> msm_host->bulk_clks);
>> bus_clk_disable:
>> @@ -2133,10 +2140,12 @@ static int sdhci_msm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> sdhci_remove_host(host, dead);
>>
>> + dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&pdev->dev, 0);
>> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
>> msm_host->bulk_clks);
>> if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk))
>> @@ -2151,6 +2160,7 @@ static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>>
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, 0);
>> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
>> msm_host->bulk_clks);
>>
>> @@ -2173,9 +2183,11 @@ static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> * restore the SDR DLL settings when the clock is ungated.
>> */
>> if (msm_host->restore_dll_config && msm_host->clk_rate)
>> - return sdhci_msm_restore_sdr_dll_config(host);
>> + ret = sdhci_msm_restore_sdr_dll_config(host);
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, msm_host->clk_rate);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static const struct dev_pm_ops sdhci_msm_pm_ops = {
>> --
>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
>> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists