lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrOFOLCWHu8nE4i5t=d+Ei-kcJ15_42Ft3ROSUDe5jkpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:52:25 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pradeep P V K <ppvk@...eaurora.org>,
        Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>,
        Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/21] mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state

On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 15:48, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On some qualcomm SoCs we need to vote on a performance state of a power
> domain depending on the clock rates. Hence move to using OPP api to set
> the clock rate and performance state specified in the OPP table.
> On platforms without an OPP table, dev_pm_opp_set_rate() is eqvivalent to
> clk_set_rate()
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org

This looks good to me!

However, are there any of the other patches in the series that
$subject patch depends on - or can I apply this as a standalone mmc
patch?

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 09ff731..d82075a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>         struct clk *xo_clk;     /* TCXO clk needed for FLL feature of cm_dll*/
>         struct clk_bulk_data bulk_clks[4]; /* core, iface, cal, sleep clocks */
>         unsigned long clk_rate;
> +       struct opp_table *opp;
>         struct mmc_host *mmc;
>         bool use_14lpp_dll_reset;
>         bool tuning_done;
> @@ -332,7 +334,7 @@ static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host,
>         int rc;
>
>         clock = msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(host, clock);
> -       rc = clk_set_rate(core_clk, clock);
> +       rc = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(mmc_dev(host->mmc), clock);
>         if (rc) {
>                 pr_err("%s: Failed to set clock at rate %u at timing %d\n",
>                        mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clock,
> @@ -1963,7 +1965,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         msm_host->bulk_clks[0].clk = clk;
>
>         /* Vote for maximum clock rate for maximum performance */
> -       ret = clk_set_rate(clk, INT_MAX);
> +       ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&pdev->dev, INT_MAX);
>         if (ret)
>                 dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "core clock boost failed\n");
>
> @@ -2087,6 +2089,9 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 goto clk_disable;
>         }
>
> +       msm_host->opp = dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(&pdev->dev, "core");
> +       dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(&pdev->dev);
> +
>         pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -2109,10 +2114,12 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         return 0;
>
>  pm_runtime_disable:
> +       dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>  clk_disable:
> +       dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&pdev->dev, 0);
>         clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
>                                    msm_host->bulk_clks);
>  bus_clk_disable:
> @@ -2133,10 +2140,12 @@ static int sdhci_msm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         sdhci_remove_host(host, dead);
>
> +       dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>
> +       dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&pdev->dev, 0);
>         clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
>                                    msm_host->bulk_clks);
>         if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk))
> @@ -2151,6 +2160,7 @@ static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>         struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>         struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>
> +       dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, 0);
>         clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
>                                    msm_host->bulk_clks);
>
> @@ -2173,9 +2183,11 @@ static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>          * restore the SDR DLL settings when the clock is ungated.
>          */
>         if (msm_host->restore_dll_config && msm_host->clk_rate)
> -               return sdhci_msm_restore_sdr_dll_config(host);
> +               ret = sdhci_msm_restore_sdr_dll_config(host);
>
> -       return 0;
> +       dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, msm_host->clk_rate);
> +
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops sdhci_msm_pm_ops = {
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ