[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8c8f37f20625922eb114574c544ebb6332ac025.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:46:27 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 11:34 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/04/15 13:20), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:43 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
> > >
> > > Andrew, since Petr can't pay attention on this perhaps it can be passed thru
> > > your tree?
> > >
> > > Sergey, Steven, what do you think?
> >
> > I'm fine with these changes. Sergey, what do you think?
>
> I'm not against it in general, I'm slightly concerned if "two users"
> is enough of a justification for new vsprintf() specifier.
Me too as separate functions could be used here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists