lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200416023425.GB30641@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:34:25 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t

On (20/04/15 13:20), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:43 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
> > 
> > Andrew, since Petr can't pay attention on this perhaps it can be passed thru
> > your tree?
> > 
> > Sergey, Steven, what do you think?
> 
> I'm fine with these changes. Sergey, what do you think?

I'm not against it in general, I'm slightly concerned if "two users"
is enough of a justification for new vsprintf() specifier.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ