[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200416023425.GB30641@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:34:25 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t
On (20/04/15 13:20), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:43 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
> >
> > Andrew, since Petr can't pay attention on this perhaps it can be passed thru
> > your tree?
> >
> > Sergey, Steven, what do you think?
>
> I'm fine with these changes. Sergey, what do you think?
I'm not against it in general, I'm slightly concerned if "two users"
is enough of a justification for new vsprintf() specifier.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists