[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200415200201.2efbbbd338a43a2f57988e2d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:02:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Gang He <ghe@...e.com>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>, ChenGang <cg.chen@...wei.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ORACLE CLUSTER FILESYSTEM 2 (OCFS2)"
<ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ocfs2: Add missing annotation for
dlm_empty_lockres()
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 07:45:49 +0800 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> On 2020/4/4 00:05, Jules Irenge wrote:
> > Sparse reports a warning at dlm_empty_lockres()
> >
> > warning: context imbalance in dlm_purge_lockres() - unexpected unlock
> >
> > The root cause is the missing annotation at dlm_purge_lockres()
> >
> > Add the missing __must_hold(&dlm->spinlock)
> >
> Seems this is duplicate with assert_spin_locked()?
I doubt is sparse is smart enough to treat assert_spin_locked() as
equivalent to __must_hold(). It would be neat though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists