[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200416030225.GD30641@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:02:25 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT
On (20/04/16 11:53), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> >
> > - dev_info(fw->cl.dev,
> > - "Attached to firmware from %04ld-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d\n",
> > - tm.tm_year + 1900, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_mday,
> > - tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min);
> > - }
> > + dev_info(fw->cl.dev, "Attached to firmware from %ptT\n", &packet);
> > }
>
> So can this be instead:
>
> struct rtc_time tm;
>
> rtc_time64_to_tm(time, &tm);
> dev_info(.... "%ptR", &tm);
^^^^
%ptRdt ?
P.S. I wonder what's the longest English word which can be constructed
from a valid vsprintf() specifiers sequence (consecutive specifiers).
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists