[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hypB1cYAis6+tg5_ckY6Z4-Xbif8ZUj5ZP+M9SFHM4fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:41:47 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@...oo.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, sched: Bail out of frequency invariance if base
frequency is unknown
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:48 AM Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Some hypervisors such as VMWare ESXi 5.5 advertise support for
> X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF but then fill all MSR's with zeroes. In particular,
> MSR_PLATFORM_INFO set to zero tricks the code that wants to know the base
> clock frequency of the CPU (highest non-turbo frequency), producing a
> division by zero when computing the ratio turbo_freq/base_freq necessary
> for frequency invariant accounting.
>
> It is to be noted that even if MSR_PLATFORM_INFO contained the appropriate
> data, APERF and MPERF are constantly zero on ESXi 5.5, thus freq-invariance
> couldn't be done in principle (not that it would make a lot of sense in a
> VM anyway). The real problem is advertising X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF. This
> appears to be fixed in more recent versions: ESXi 6.7 doesn't advertise
> that feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
> Fixes: 1567c3e3467c ("x86, sched: Add support for frequency invariance")
Please feel free to add
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
to all patches in the series and I'm expecting them to be routed through tip.
Thanks!
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index fe3ab9632f3b..3a318ec9bc17 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1985,6 +1985,15 @@ static bool intel_set_max_freq_ratio(void)
> return false;
>
> out:
> + /*
> + * Some hypervisors advertise X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF
> + * but then fill all MSR's with zeroes.
> + */
> + if (!base_freq) {
> + pr_debug("Couldn't determine cpu base frequency, necessary for scale-invariant accounting.\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> arch_turbo_freq_ratio = div_u64(turbo_freq * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE,
> base_freq);
> arch_set_max_freq_ratio(turbo_disabled());
> --
> 2.16.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists