[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <758a8d30-1065-c98f-3c8d-590be35935ff@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:21:05 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
harini.katakam@...inx.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
pthombar@...ence.com, sergio.prado@...abworks.com,
antoine.tenart@...tlin.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, andrew@...n.ch,
michal.simek@...inx.com, Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] net: macb: fix wakeup test in runtime suspend/resume
routines
On 4/16/2020 10:44 AM, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>
> Use the proper struct device pointer to check if the wakeup flag
> and wakeup source are positioned.
> Use the one passed by function call which is equivalent to
> &bp->dev->dev.parent.
>
> It's preventing the trigger of a spurious interrupt in case the
> Wake-on-Lan feature is used.
>
> Fixes: bc1109d04c39 ("net: macb: Add pm runtime support")
> Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> Cc: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
> Cc: Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists