[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k12fm7vp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:35:22 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split lock enumeration cleanup and fixes
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> writes:
> Need to revisit the sequence of operations when testing for the
> split lock detect feature. It is model specific, so we must check
> the model number before looking at CORE_CAPABILITIES.
>
> I marked it all for stable ... some tweaking would be needed if
> the X86_MATCH_INTEL stuff from v5.7 doesn't get backported.
Why stable? The split lock stuff got merged post 5.6.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists