[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F5E8BDA@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:39:43 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] Split lock enumeration cleanup and fixes
> Why stable? The split lock stuff got merged post 5.6.
I have no sense of time ... in my memory it went in ages ago. I guess I'm remembering
it making it into TIP.
Drop the stable stuff ... obviously no need.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists