[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200417075150.GC598@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:51:50 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Max Kellermann <mk@...all.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, bfields@...hat.com, tytso@....edu,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, agruenba@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] linux/fs.h: fix umask on NFS with
CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=n
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> #define IS_POSIXACL(inode) __IS_FLG(inode, SB_POSIXACL)
> +#else
> +#define IS_POSIXACL(inode) 0
> +#endif
Looks good, but I'd simplify this down to:
#define IS_POSIXACL(inode) \
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL) && __IS_FLG(inode, SB_POSIXACL))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists