[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR1101MB2132BBB45C6683D6BE1FBCD897D90@BN6PR1101MB2132.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 01:32:40 +0000
From: "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
CC: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
"Chiang, Mac" <mac.chiang@...el.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ASoC: bdw-rt5650: remove 3-channel capture support
>
> It seems like a generic problem on all Broadwell devices so let's solve with
> one a single patchset.
>
> Shouldn't we just add the 2ch constraints for broadwell.c and bdw-rt5677.c,
> and the 2 or 4ch constraint for bdw-rt5650.c? Would this work for you?
>
> Thanks
> -Pierre
Hi Pierre,
Are you saying submitting a new patch to add constraints to all three broadwell.c,
bdw-rt5650.c, and bdw-rt5677.c?
Regards,
Brent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists