[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95d0a64e-d2e9-7117-75c5-6c68b1426f93@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:59:01 +0200
From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To: "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
"Chiang, Mac" <mac.chiang@...el.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: bdw-rt5650: remove 3-channel capture support
On 2020-04-17 03:32, Lu, Brent wrote:
>>
>> It seems like a generic problem on all Broadwell devices so let's solve with
>> one a single patchset.
>>
>> Shouldn't we just add the 2ch constraints for broadwell.c and bdw-rt5677.c,
>> and the 2 or 4ch constraint for bdw-rt5650.c? Would this work for you?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Pierre
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Are you saying submitting a new patch to add constraints to all three broadwell.c,
> bdw-rt5650.c, and bdw-rt5677.c?
>
>
> Regards,
> Brent
>
What Pierre suggested is that you submit a series of patches instead -
one for each of BDW machine boards. If the same problem exists on all of
them, there is no reason to left other boards unattended.
Czarek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists