[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d3e4511-27f4-3523-a90c-2ff64d1d9c89@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:15:50 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation
On 4/17/20 10:48 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> p = firmware ? kstrdup_const(…) : kasprintf(…);
>>
>> For simple assignments, I too prefer the ternary operator,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>
>> but in this case, I think it is better to leave the current code as is.
>
> Would you like to consider the use of the function “kvasprintf_const”
> according to your review comment for the update step “[PATCH v2 4/7] remoteproc:
> Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrup()”?
This patch is just swapping the condition order, so will automatically
be adjusted for any changes in patch 4 during the rebase.
regards
Suman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists