linux-kernel - Re: [v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:15:50 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation

On 4/17/20 10:48 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>      p = firmware ? kstrdup_const(…) : kasprintf(…);
>>
>> For simple assignments, I too prefer the ternary operator,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback.
> 
> 
>> but in this case, I think it is better to leave the current code as is.
> 
> Would you like to consider the use of the function “kvasprintf_const”
> according to your review comment for the update step “[PATCH v2 4/7] remoteproc:
> Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrup()”?

This patch is just swapping the condition order, so will automatically 
be adjusted for any changes in patch 4 during the rebase.

regards
Suman