linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 0/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB46402211952BC3D427AADA00FCD60@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:38:48 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "kwmad.kim@...sung.com" <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI

 
> 
> This patch-set introduces UFS (Universal Flash Storage) host controller
> support
> for Samsung family SoC. Mostly, it consists of UFS PHY and host specific
> driver.
> 
> - Changes since v5:
> * re-introduce various quicks which was removed because of no driver
> * consumer of those quirks, initial 4 patches does the same.
You forgot to add those quirks to ufs_fixups.
Each patch that introduces a quirk needs to introduce its users as well - 
This is the reason it was removed in the first place.

Thanks,
Avri