[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.2004181509030.2671@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
jonas@...boo.se, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
jernej.skrabec@...l.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Introduce "uses" keyword
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> (FOO || !FOO) is difficult to understand, but
> the behavior of "uses FOO" is as difficult to grasp.
Can't this be expressed as the following instead:
depends on FOO if FOO
That would be a little clearer.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists