lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9626e96-4bdb-e7e1-51e7-a99210de4c32@web.de>
Date:   Sun, 19 Apr 2020 13:19:05 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>,
        Shengju Zhang <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: asic3: Add error checking return in
 asic3_mfd_probe()

> In the function asic3_mfd_probe(), when get resource or irq
> failed, the value returned just detected and debug error message,
> but there were no error checking return. So add the right error
> checking return.

I suggest to improve the commit message.
Would you like to adjust the patch subject?


> And remove the redundant 'ret = 0'.

I propose to reconsider this interpretation of the source code here.
How do you think about to move the mentioned statement into an else branch
at the end?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ