linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: slave-eeprom: initialize empty eeprom properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200420205325.GA1693@ninjato>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:53:26 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Patrick Williams <patrick@...cx.xyz>
Cc:     Bjorn Ardo <bjorn.ardo@...s.com>,
        Patrick Williams <alpawi@...zon.com>,
        Björn Ardö <bjornar@...s.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: slave-eeprom: initialize empty eeprom properly

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:31:46PM -0500, Patrick Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:43:49PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:20:53AM +0200, Bjorn Ardo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I sent in another patch earlier that added support for specifying a file in
> > > devicetree to initilize the eeprom from, corresponding to the case of
> > > pre-flashed eeprom. Maybe these two patches should be merged so this
> > > initialization is only done if no file is specified?
> > 
> > Yes, I agree.
> > 
> 
> It looks like Bjorn's referenced patches are still unmerged also?

Yes, it might be easiest if he merges your patch (with attribution) into
the else branch of his fw-load patch.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)