linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200421092935.21eeb395@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:29:35 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:18:11 -0700 John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:41 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the qcom tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c: In function '__tcs_buffer_write':
> > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c:484:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_rpmh_send_msg_rcuidle'; did you mean 'trace_rpmh_send_msg_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   484 |   trace_rpmh_send_msg_rcuidle(drv, tcs_id, j, msgid, cmd);
> >       |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >       |   trace_rpmh_send_msg_enabled
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > I don't know why this error only started happening today.  However
> > reverting commit
> >
> >   1d3c6f86fd3f ("soc: qcom: rpmh: Allow RPMH driver to be loaded as a module")
> >
> > fixes the build, so I have done that for today.  
> 
> 
> Ah. I'm guessing the newly added rpmh-rsc code depends on rpmh being built in.
> 
> I'll take a look at it.

I am still reverting that commit.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped