[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJQfnxF+Sw2tDf4-WwUdJNV9nxjjwr3H48=pt8Ja0eTt8jEdeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:49:01 +0800
From: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...gle.com>
To: linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: L2CAP: add support for waiting
disconnection resp
[Re-sending in plain text]
Hi bluetooth maintainers,
May I ask for your review on this?
Thanks,
Archie
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 16:09, Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> From: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>
>
> Whenever we disconnect a L2CAP connection, we would immediately
> report a disconnection event (EPOLLHUP) to the upper layer, without
> waiting for the response of the other device.
>
> This patch offers an option to wait until we receive a disconnection
> response before reporting disconnection event, by using the "how"
> parameter in l2cap_sock_shutdown(). Therefore, upper layer can opt
> to wait for disconnection response by shutdown(sock, SHUT_WR).
>
> This can be used to enforce proper disconnection order in HID,
> where the disconnection of the interrupt channel must be complete
> before attempting to disconnect the control channel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> index 1cea42ee1e922..a995d2c51fa7f 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> @@ -1271,14 +1271,21 @@ static int l2cap_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
> struct l2cap_conn *conn;
> int err = 0;
>
> - BT_DBG("sock %p, sk %p", sock, sk);
> + BT_DBG("sock %p, sk %p, how %d", sock, sk, how);
> +
> + /* 'how' parameter is mapped to sk_shutdown as follows:
> + * SHUT_RD (0) --> RCV_SHUTDOWN (1)
> + * SHUT_WR (1) --> SEND_SHUTDOWN (2)
> + * SHUT_RDWR (2) --> SHUTDOWN_MASK (3)
> + */
> + how++;
>
> if (!sk)
> return 0;
>
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> - if (sk->sk_shutdown)
> + if ((sk->sk_shutdown & how) == how)
> goto shutdown_already;
>
> BT_DBG("Handling sock shutdown");
> @@ -1301,11 +1308,20 @@ static int l2cap_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
> * has already been actioned to close the L2CAP
> * link such as by l2cap_disconnection_req().
> */
> - if (sk->sk_shutdown)
> - goto has_shutdown;
> + if ((sk->sk_shutdown & how) == how)
> + goto shutdown_matched;
> }
>
> - sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
> + /* Try setting the RCV_SHUTDOWN bit, return early if SEND_SHUTDOWN
> + * is already set
> + */
> + if ((how & RCV_SHUTDOWN) && !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
> + sk->sk_shutdown |= RCV_SHUTDOWN;
> + if ((sk->sk_shutdown & how) == how)
> + goto shutdown_matched;
> + }
> +
> + sk->sk_shutdown |= SEND_SHUTDOWN;
> release_sock(sk);
>
> l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
> @@ -1335,7 +1351,7 @@ static int l2cap_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
> err = bt_sock_wait_state(sk, BT_CLOSED,
> sk->sk_lingertime);
>
> -has_shutdown:
> +shutdown_matched:
> l2cap_chan_put(chan);
> sock_put(sk);
>
> @@ -1363,7 +1379,7 @@ static int l2cap_sock_release(struct socket *sock)
>
> bt_sock_unlink(&l2cap_sk_list, sk);
>
> - err = l2cap_sock_shutdown(sock, 2);
> + err = l2cap_sock_shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
> chan = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan;
>
> l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
> --
> 2.26.0.110.g2183baf09c-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists