| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200420115316.18781-56-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:53:11 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 55/60] perf callchain: Stitch LBR call stack
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
In LBR call stack mode, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack limits
to the number of LBR registers.
For example, on skylake, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack is
always <= 32.
# To display the perf.data header info, please use
# --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 6K of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 6487119731
#
# Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........ ............... ..................
# ................................
99.97% 99.97% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f43
|
--99.64%--f11
f12
f13
f14
f15
f16
f17
f18
f19
f20
f21
f22
f23
f24
f25
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
f32
f33
f34
f35
f36
f37
f38
f39
f40
f41
f42
f43
For a call stack which is deeper than LBR limit, HW will overwrite the
LBR register with oldest branch. Only partial call stacks can be
reconstructed.
However, the overwritten LBRs may still be retrieved from previous
sample. At that moment, HW hasn't overwritten the LBR registers yet.
Perf tools can stitch those overwritten LBRs on current call stacks to
get a more complete call stack.
To determine if LBRs can be stitched, perf tools need to compare current
sample with previous sample.
- They should have identical LBR records (Same from, to and flags
values, and the same physical index of LBR registers).
- The searching starts from the base-of-stack of current sample.
Once perf determines to stitch the previous LBRs, the corresponding LBR
cursor nodes will be copied to 'lists'. The 'lists' is to track the LBR
cursor nodes which are going to be stitched.
When the stitching is over, the nodes will not be freed immediately.
They will be moved to 'free_lists'. Next stitching may reuse the space.
Both 'lists' and 'free_lists' will be freed when all samples are
processed.
Committer notes:
Fix the intel-pt.c initialization of the union with 'struct
branch_flags', that breaks the build with its unnamed union on older gcc
versions.
Uninline thread__free_stitch_list(), as it grew big and started dragging
includes to thread.h, so move it to thread.c where what it needs in
terms of headers are already there.
This fixes the build in several systems such as debian:experimental when
cross building to the MIPS32 architecture, i.e. in the other cases what
was needed was being included by sheer luck.
In file included from builtin-sched.c:11:
util/thread.h: In function 'thread__free_stitch_list':
util/thread.h:169:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'free' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
169 | free(pos);
| ^~~~
util/thread.h:169:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' [-Werror]
util/thread.h:19:1: note: include '<stdlib.h>' or provide a declaration of 'free'
18 | #include "callchain.h"
+++ |+#include <stdlib.h>
19 |
util/thread.h:174:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' [-Werror]
174 | free(pos);
| ^~~~
util/thread.h:174:3: note: include '<stdlib.h>' or provide a declaration of 'free'
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200319202517.23423-13-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/branch.h | 19 +++--
tools/perf/util/callchain.h | 5 ++
tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 17 +++--
tools/perf/util/machine.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/perf/util/thread.c | 22 ++++++
tools/perf/util/thread.h | 14 +---
6 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/branch.h b/tools/perf/util/branch.h
index 154a05cd03af..4d3f02fa223d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/branch.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/branch.h
@@ -15,13 +15,18 @@
#include "event.h"
struct branch_flags {
- u64 mispred:1;
- u64 predicted:1;
- u64 in_tx:1;
- u64 abort:1;
- u64 cycles:16;
- u64 type:4;
- u64 reserved:40;
+ union {
+ u64 value;
+ struct {
+ u64 mispred:1;
+ u64 predicted:1;
+ u64 in_tx:1;
+ u64 abort:1;
+ u64 cycles:16;
+ u64 type:4;
+ u64 reserved:40;
+ };
+ };
};
struct branch_info {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.h b/tools/perf/util/callchain.h
index cb33cd42ff43..8f668ee29f25 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.h
@@ -154,6 +154,11 @@ struct callchain_cursor_node {
struct callchain_cursor_node *next;
};
+struct stitch_list {
+ struct list_head node;
+ struct callchain_cursor_node cursor;
+};
+
struct callchain_cursor {
u64 nr;
struct callchain_cursor_node *first;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
index a659b4a1b3f2..4be7634dccf5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
@@ -1717,15 +1717,14 @@ static u64 intel_pt_lbr_flags(u64 info)
union {
struct branch_flags flags;
u64 result;
- } u = {
- .flags = {
- .mispred = !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED),
- .predicted = !(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED),
- .in_tx = !!(info & LBR_INFO_IN_TX),
- .abort = !!(info & LBR_INFO_ABORT),
- .cycles = info & LBR_INFO_CYCLES,
- }
- };
+ } u;
+
+ u.result = 0;
+ u.flags.mispred = !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
+ u.flags.predicted = !(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
+ u.flags.in_tx = !!(info & LBR_INFO_IN_TX);
+ u.flags.abort = !!(info & LBR_INFO_ABORT);
+ u.flags.cycles = info & LBR_INFO_CYCLES;
return u.result;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index 737dee723a57..5ac32cabe4e6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -2348,6 +2348,119 @@ static int lbr_callchain_add_lbr_ip(struct thread *thread,
return 0;
}
+static int lbr_callchain_add_stitched_lbr_ip(struct thread *thread,
+ struct callchain_cursor *cursor)
+{
+ struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
+ struct callchain_cursor_node *cnode;
+ struct stitch_list *stitch_node;
+ int err;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(stitch_node, &lbr_stitch->lists, node) {
+ cnode = &stitch_node->cursor;
+
+ err = callchain_cursor_append(cursor, cnode->ip,
+ &cnode->ms,
+ cnode->branch,
+ &cnode->branch_flags,
+ cnode->nr_loop_iter,
+ cnode->iter_cycles,
+ cnode->branch_from,
+ cnode->srcline);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct stitch_list *get_stitch_node(struct thread *thread)
+{
+ struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
+ struct stitch_list *stitch_node;
+
+ if (!list_empty(&lbr_stitch->free_lists)) {
+ stitch_node = list_first_entry(&lbr_stitch->free_lists,
+ struct stitch_list, node);
+ list_del(&stitch_node->node);
+
+ return stitch_node;
+ }
+
+ return malloc(sizeof(struct stitch_list));
+}
+
+static bool has_stitched_lbr(struct thread *thread,
+ struct perf_sample *cur,
+ struct perf_sample *prev,
+ unsigned int max_lbr,
+ bool callee)
+{
+ struct branch_stack *cur_stack = cur->branch_stack;
+ struct branch_entry *cur_entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(cur);
+ struct branch_stack *prev_stack = prev->branch_stack;
+ struct branch_entry *prev_entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(prev);
+ struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
+ int i, j, nr_identical_branches = 0;
+ struct stitch_list *stitch_node;
+ u64 cur_base, distance;
+
+ if (!cur_stack || !prev_stack)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Find the physical index of the base-of-stack for current sample. */
+ cur_base = max_lbr - cur_stack->nr + cur_stack->hw_idx + 1;
+
+ distance = (prev_stack->hw_idx > cur_base) ? (prev_stack->hw_idx - cur_base) :
+ (max_lbr + prev_stack->hw_idx - cur_base);
+ /* Previous sample has shorter stack. Nothing can be stitched. */
+ if (distance + 1 > prev_stack->nr)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if there are identical LBRs between two samples.
+ * Identicall LBRs must have same from, to and flags values. Also,
+ * they have to be saved in the same LBR registers (same physical
+ * index).
+ *
+ * Starts from the base-of-stack of current sample.
+ */
+ for (i = distance, j = cur_stack->nr - 1; (i >= 0) && (j >= 0); i--, j--) {
+ if ((prev_entries[i].from != cur_entries[j].from) ||
+ (prev_entries[i].to != cur_entries[j].to) ||
+ (prev_entries[i].flags.value != cur_entries[j].flags.value))
+ break;
+ nr_identical_branches++;
+ }
+
+ if (!nr_identical_branches)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Save the LBRs between the base-of-stack of previous sample
+ * and the base-of-stack of current sample into lbr_stitch->lists.
+ * These LBRs will be stitched later.
+ */
+ for (i = prev_stack->nr - 1; i > (int)distance; i--) {
+
+ if (!lbr_stitch->prev_lbr_cursor[i].valid)
+ continue;
+
+ stitch_node = get_stitch_node(thread);
+ if (!stitch_node)
+ return false;
+
+ memcpy(&stitch_node->cursor, &lbr_stitch->prev_lbr_cursor[i],
+ sizeof(struct callchain_cursor_node));
+
+ if (callee)
+ list_add(&stitch_node->node, &lbr_stitch->lists);
+ else
+ list_add_tail(&stitch_node->node, &lbr_stitch->lists);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static bool alloc_lbr_stitch(struct thread *thread, unsigned int max_lbr)
{
if (thread->lbr_stitch)
@@ -2361,6 +2474,9 @@ static bool alloc_lbr_stitch(struct thread *thread, unsigned int max_lbr)
if (!thread->lbr_stitch->prev_lbr_cursor)
goto free_lbr_stitch;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->lbr_stitch->lists);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->lbr_stitch->free_lists);
+
return true;
free_lbr_stitch:
@@ -2386,9 +2502,11 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
int max_stack,
unsigned int max_lbr)
{
+ bool callee = (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE);
struct ip_callchain *chain = sample->callchain;
int chain_nr = min(max_stack, (int)chain->nr), i;
struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch;
+ bool stitched_lbr = false;
u64 branch_from = 0;
int err;
@@ -2405,10 +2523,18 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
(max_lbr > 0) && alloc_lbr_stitch(thread, max_lbr)) {
lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
+ stitched_lbr = has_stitched_lbr(thread, sample,
+ &lbr_stitch->prev_sample,
+ max_lbr, callee);
+
+ if (!stitched_lbr && !list_empty(&lbr_stitch->lists)) {
+ list_replace_init(&lbr_stitch->lists,
+ &lbr_stitch->free_lists);
+ }
memcpy(&lbr_stitch->prev_sample, sample, sizeof(*sample));
}
- if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
+ if (callee) {
/* Add kernel ip */
err = lbr_callchain_add_kernel_ip(thread, cursor, sample,
parent, root_al, branch_from,
@@ -2421,7 +2547,18 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
if (err)
goto error;
+ if (stitched_lbr) {
+ err = lbr_callchain_add_stitched_lbr_ip(thread, cursor);
+ if (err)
+ goto error;
+ }
+
} else {
+ if (stitched_lbr) {
+ err = lbr_callchain_add_stitched_lbr_ip(thread, cursor);
+ if (err)
+ goto error;
+ }
err = lbr_callchain_add_lbr_ip(thread, cursor, sample, parent,
root_al, &branch_from, false);
if (err)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
index 8d0da260c84c..665e5c0618ed 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
@@ -454,3 +454,25 @@ int thread__memcpy(struct thread *thread, struct machine *machine,
return dso__data_read_offset(al.map->dso, machine, offset, buf, len);
}
+
+void thread__free_stitch_list(struct thread *thread)
+{
+ struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
+ struct stitch_list *pos, *tmp;
+
+ if (!lbr_stitch)
+ return;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &lbr_stitch->lists, node) {
+ list_del_init(&pos->node);
+ free(pos);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &lbr_stitch->free_lists, node) {
+ list_del_init(&pos->node);
+ free(pos);
+ }
+
+ zfree(&lbr_stitch->prev_lbr_cursor);
+ zfree(&thread->lbr_stitch);
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.h b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
index 8456174a52c5..b066fb30d203 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/thread.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
#include <linux/refcount.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
-#include <linux/zalloc.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
@@ -24,6 +23,8 @@ struct thread_stack;
struct unwind_libunwind_ops;
struct lbr_stitch {
+ struct list_head lists;
+ struct list_head free_lists;
struct perf_sample prev_sample;
struct callchain_cursor_node *prev_lbr_cursor;
};
@@ -154,15 +155,6 @@ static inline bool thread__is_filtered(struct thread *thread)
return false;
}
-static inline void thread__free_stitch_list(struct thread *thread)
-{
- struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
-
- if (!lbr_stitch)
- return;
-
- zfree(&lbr_stitch->prev_lbr_cursor);
- zfree(&thread->lbr_stitch);
-}
+void thread__free_stitch_list(struct thread *thread);
#endif /* __PERF_THREAD_H */
--
2.21.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists