| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200420115316.18781-57-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:53:12 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 56/60] perf report: Add option to enable the LBR stitching approach
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
With the LBR stitching approach, the reconstructed LBR call stack can
break the HW limitation. However, it may reconstruct invalid call stacks
in some cases, e.g. exception handing such as setjmp/longjmp. Also, it
may impact the processing time especially when the number of samples
with stitched LBRs are huge.
Add an option to enable the approach.
# To display the perf.data header info, please use
# --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 6K of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 6492797701
#
# Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........ ............... ..................
# .................................
#
99.99% 99.99% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f43
|
---main
f1
f2
f3
f4
f5
f6
f7
f8
f9
f10
f11
f12
f13
f14
f15
f16
f17
f18
f19
f20
f21
f22
f23
f24
f25
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
|
--99.65%--f32
f33
f34
f35
f36
f37
f38
f39
f40
f41
f42
f43
Committer testing:
$ perf record --call-graph lbr /wb/tchain_edit
[ perf record: Woken up 23 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 5.578 MB perf.data (6839 samples) ]
$ perf report --header-only | egrep 'cpu(desc|.*capabilities)'
# cpudesc : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500 CPU @ 3.40GHz
# cpu pmu capabilities: branches=32, max_precise=3, pmu_name=skylake
$
Before:
$ perf report --no-children --stdio
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 6K of event 'cycles:u'
# Event count (approx.): 6459523879
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........... ................ .......................
#
99.95% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f43
|
--99.92%--f43
f42
f41
f40
f39
f38
f37
f36
f35
f34
f33
f32
f31
f30
f29
f28
f27
f26
f25
f24
f23
f22
f21
f20
f19
f18
f17
f16
f15
f14
f13
f12
f11
0.03% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f42
0.01% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f41
0.00% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f31
0.00% tchain_edit ld-2.29.so [.] _dl_relocate_object
0.00% tchain_edit ld-2.29.so [.] memmove
0.00% tchain_edit [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff93a00b17
After:
$ perf report --stitch-lbr --no-children --stdio
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 6K of event 'cycles:u'
# Event count (approx.): 6459496645
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........... ................ ........................
#
99.97% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f43
|
--99.93%--f43
f42
f41
f40
f39
f38
f37
f36
f35
f34
f33
f32
f31
f30
f29
f28
f27
f26
f25
f24
f23
f22
f21
f20
f19
f18
f17
f16
f15
f14
f13
f12
f11
f10
f9
f8
f7
f6
f5
f4
f3
f2
f1
main
__libc_start_main
0.02% tchain_edit [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff93a00b17
0.01% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f31
0.00% tchain_edit ld-2.29.so [.] _dl_important_hwcaps
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200319202517.23423-14-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt | 11 +++++++++++
tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
index f569b9ea4002..d068103690cc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
@@ -488,6 +488,17 @@ include::itrace.txt[]
This option extends the perf report to show reference callgraphs,
which collected by reference event, in no callgraph event.
+--stitch-lbr::
+ Show callgraph with stitched LBRs, which may have more complete
+ callgraph. The perf.data file must have been obtained using
+ perf record --call-graph lbr.
+ Disabled by default. In common cases with call stack overflows,
+ it can recreate better call stacks than the default lbr call stack
+ output. But this approach is not full proof. There can be cases
+ where it creates incorrect call stacks from incorrect matches.
+ The known limitations include exception handing such as
+ setjmp/longjmp will have calls/returns not match.
+
--socket-filter::
Only report the samples on the processor socket that match with this filter
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index c0cebd53ecf9..0c32767b1c56 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct report {
bool header_only;
bool nonany_branch_mode;
bool group_set;
+ bool stitch_lbr;
int max_stack;
struct perf_read_values show_threads_values;
struct annotation_options annotation_opts;
@@ -267,6 +268,9 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
return -1;
}
+ if (rep->stitch_lbr)
+ al.thread->lbr_stitch_enable = true;
+
if (symbol_conf.hide_unresolved && al.sym == NULL)
goto out_put;
@@ -408,6 +412,12 @@ static int report__setup_sample_type(struct report *rep)
callchain_param.record_mode = CALLCHAIN_FP;
}
+ if (rep->stitch_lbr && (callchain_param.record_mode != CALLCHAIN_LBR)) {
+ ui__warning("Can't find LBR callchain. Switch off --stitch-lbr.\n"
+ "Please apply --call-graph lbr when recording.\n");
+ rep->stitch_lbr = false;
+ }
+
/* ??? handle more cases than just ANY? */
if (!(perf_evlist__combined_branch_type(session->evlist) &
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY))
@@ -1258,6 +1268,8 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **argv)
"Show full source file name path for source lines"),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "show-ref-call-graph", &symbol_conf.show_ref_callgraph,
"Show callgraph from reference event"),
+ OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "stitch-lbr", &report.stitch_lbr,
+ "Enable LBR callgraph stitching approach"),
OPT_INTEGER(0, "socket-filter", &report.socket_filter,
"only show processor socket that match with this filter"),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "raw-trace", &symbol_conf.raw_trace,
--
2.21.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists