[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU411Eoo_E=aQiR=Vk2Tx6XCZEuiz25NykWY+dd5wKrszg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:04:31 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
Cc: "akpm@...l.org" <akpm@...l.org>,
"xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn" <xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"anna.schumaker@...app.com" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
"okir@...e.de" <okir@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tanxin.ctf@...il.com" <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>,
"yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn" <yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn>,
"kjlu@....edu" <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix potential posix_acl refcnt leak in nfs3_set_acl
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:59 PM Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com> wrote:
> Well, that should Oops when either IS_ERR(acl) or IS_ERR(dfacl)
> triggers, shouldn't it?
Yes, checks missings. But you get the idea.
Thanks,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists