[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c19f1a6ac3664dca12706400dc425538ccf8f101.camel@hammerspace.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:13:43 +0000
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
To: "agruenba@...hat.com" <agruenba@...hat.com>
CC: "okir@...e.de" <okir@...e.de>,
"tanxin.ctf@...il.com" <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>,
"xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn" <xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn>,
"akpm@...l.org" <akpm@...l.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"anna.schumaker@...app.com" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
"kjlu@....edu" <kjlu@....edu>,
"yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn" <yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix potential posix_acl refcnt leak in nfs3_set_acl
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 15:04 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:59 PM Trond Myklebust <
> trondmy@...merspace.com> wrote:
> > Well, that should Oops when either IS_ERR(acl) or IS_ERR(dfacl)
> > triggers, shouldn't it?
>
> Yes, checks missings. But you get the idea.
>
Fair enough 🙂
Can I expect an official patch from either you or the original
submitters?
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists