linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scsi: core: Allow the state change from SDEV_QUIESCE to SDEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <HK0P153MB02739AAF1415BCC36D8C4EB2BFD50@HK0P153MB0273.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 03:01:34 +0000
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: core: Allow the state change from SDEV_QUIESCE to
 SDEV_BLOCK

> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:42 PM
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com; martin.petersen@...cle.com;
> linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; hch@....de;
> bvanassche@....org; hare@...e.de; Michael Kelley
> <mikelley@...rosoft.com>; Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Allow the state change from SDEV_QUIESCE to
> SDEV_BLOCK
> 
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:40:45PM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > The APIs scsi_host_block()/scsi_host_unblock() are recently added by:
> > 2bb955840c1d ("scsi: core: add scsi_host_(block,unblock) helper function")
> > and so far the APIs are only used by:
> > 3d3ca53b1639 ("scsi: aacraid: use scsi_host_(block,unblock) to block I/O")
> >
> > However, from reading the code, I think the APIs don't really work for
> > aacraid, because, in the resume path of hibernation, when aac_suspend() ->
> > scsi_host_block() is called, scsi_device_quiesce() has set the state to
> > SDEV_QUIESCE, so aac_suspend() -> scsi_host_block() returns -EINVAL.
> >
> > Fix the issue by allowing the state change.
> >
> > Fixes: 2bb955840c1d ("scsi: core: add scsi_host_(block,unblock) helper
> function")
> > Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index 47835c4b4ee0..06c260f6cdae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -2284,6 +2284,7 @@ scsi_device_set_state(struct scsi_device *sdev,
> enum scsi_device_state state)
> >  		switch (oldstate) {
> >  		case SDEV_RUNNING:
> >  		case SDEV_CREATED_BLOCK:
> > +		case SDEV_QUIESCE:
> >  		case SDEV_OFFLINE:
> >  			break;
> >  		default:
> 
> Looks reasonable because SDEV_BLOCK is one more strict state than
> QEIESCE, so:

Thanks, Ming!

> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...ha.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming

There should be a small typo: s/redha/redhat :-)

Thanks,
-- Dexuan